|
|
-
POLICY
CONCERNING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FACULTY MERIT INCREASE
-
AND SERVICE
SALARY STEP INCREASE PROGRAMS
-
-
FAM 585
-
FSD 99-02.R1
Faculty Affairs Committee
May 2000
1. Preamble.
This document is designed to implement the
sections in Article 31 in the Memorandum of Understanding for employees
in the Faculty Bargaining Unit (Unit 3) dealing with the Faculty Merit Increase
and Service Salary Step Increase Programs. All Faculty Merit Increase (FMI)
and Service Salary Step Increase (SSSI) awards at California State University,
San Bernardino shall be made in conformance with this policy. In any instance
of conflict between the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) and this FMI policy,
the MOU shall govern.
All faculty, both tenure-track and temporary,
have the right to be involved in the departmental determination of the appropriate
FMI structure, all faculty have the right to participate in voting for and
serving on department committees should that be the mechanism chosen, and
all faculty have the right to participate in voting for and serving on the
campus appeals panel. All appeals panel and committee members shall have
equal voting rights as committee or panel members regardless of time base.
Each department shall be responsible for ensuring that adequate records
concerning temporary faculty are maintained.
2. Definitions.
| 2.1 |
The term "department"
shall be used to refer to an academic department or equivalent unit
for the purpose of this FMI policy. The three equivalent units shall
be (a) coaches, (b) counselors, and (c) librarians. Each department
or equivalent unit may have a "Department" FMI Committee. Individual
instructional faculty unit employees in Undergraduate Studies shall
be grouped with the academic department(s) most closely related to the
discipline(s) they teach for the portion of their time base relevant
to each department. Temporary faculty in a college teaching interdisciplinary
courses and not assigned to a department shall make a permanent decision
concerning with which department in the college they choose to be grouped
for the purpose of this FMI policy. Tenure-track faculty with joint
appointments shall be assigned to their primary department for the purpose
of FMI review. Temporary faculty teaching in more than one department
shall be reviewed in each department for the portion of their time base
relevant to that department. |
| 2.2 |
The term "department
chair" shall be used to refer to an academic department chair or equivalent
for the purpose of this FMI policy. The department chair equivalent
for coaches shall be the Athletics Compliance Officer. The department
chair equivalent for Librarians shall be the Faculty Senate Librarian
representative. The department chair equivalent for Counselors shall
be their immediate supervisors. These definitions of department chair
equivalents do not imply an expectation that Management Personnel Plan
faculty will serve on department FMI or SSSI committees. |
| 2.3 |
The term "college"
shall be used to refer to an academic college or equivalent unit for
the purpose of this FMI policy. The three units equivalent to colleges
shall be (a) Athletics, (b) Student Affairs, and (c) Library. |
| 2.4 |
The term "dean" shall be used
to refer to an academic dean or equivalent for the purpose of this FMI
policy. For coaches, the Director of Athletics shall be the college
dean equivalent. For librarians, the University Librarian shall be the
dean equivalent. For counselors, the Vice President for Student Affairs
shall be the dean equivalent. |
3. Annual Activities Report (AAR).
Each faculty unit employee shall submit three
copies of a completed Annual Activities Report (AAR) to her/his department
chair.
| 3.1 |
For 1998/99 and
1999/00, the AAR shall be submitted no later than October 1, 1999. This
report shall detail annual faculty activities in separate sections as
follows. |
| a) |
For 1998/99,
all appropriate activities from July 1, 1995 or from the period covered
in the last successful PSSI review or from the date of initial appointment
(whichever beginning date is most recent) through June 30, 1998; FMIs
to be effective July 1, 1998. |
| b) |
For 1999/00, all appropriate
activities from July 1, 1998 through June 30, 1999; FMIs to be effective
July 1, 1999. |
| 3.2 |
The AAR shall
be submitted no later than October 1 of each year thereafter. In fiscal
year 2000/01, the time period of review for activities contained in
the AAR shall be July 1, 1999 through June 30, 2000. Additional time
lines for the FMI program for each year shall be as provided in Appendix
G of the MOU. |
| 3.3 |
The AAR format
shall be as shown in Attachment 1. Each AAR
shall include the faculty unit employee's rank/classification, salary,
date of appointment, and whether the faculty unit employee is eligible
for a Service Salary Step Increase. |
| 3.4 |
The AAR must cover
only the designated time period. If an activity is spread out over more
than this period, the AAR must describe the contribution to this activity
which was made during that time period. |
4. FMI Eligibility.
All full- and part-time faculty unit employees
who submit completed AARs are eligible for and shall be considered for FMIs
except those indicated in Sections 4.1 and 4.2 below.
| 4.1 |
The following
employees are not eligible for FMIs: Substitute Instructional Faculty,
Instructional Faculty - Extension, Instructional Faculty - Special Programs,
Instructional Faculty - Summer Arts, Instructional Faculty - Summer
Session, persons not employed during the applicable review period as
specified in Section 3, and persons on full-time leave without pay for
personal reasons during the entire applicable review period. |
| 4.2 |
Faculty unit employees who
indicate on their AARs that they decline to participate in the FMI program
shall not be considered for FMIs. |
| 4.3 |
The following
is a clarification of FMI eligibility for part-time temporary employees: |
| 1) |
For 1998/99,
part-time temporary faculty unit employees who submit completed AARs,
who had an appointment at any point during the period July 1, 1995
through June 30, 1998, and who are eligible to receive the FMI award
shall be eligible for consideration for an FMI. |
| 2) |
For 1999/00 and thereafter,
part-time temporary faculty unit employees who submit completed AARs,
who had an appointment at any point during the period of the review
cycle, and who are eligible to receive the FMI award shall be eligible
for consideration for an FMI. |
| 3) |
A part-time temporary faculty
unit employee shall have an appointment at some point during the current
academic year for which the FMI awards are effective in order to be
eligible to receive an FMI. The department shall be responsible for
making its best determination as to whether or not a part-time temporary
faculty unit employee has reason to expect an appointment for the
Winter and/or Spring quarters of that current academic year when implementing
Sections 4.3.a and 4.3.b. |
5. Criteria.
| 5.1 |
Faculty unit employees shall
be eligible for FMIs for demonstrated performance commensurate with
rank, work assignment, and years of service for: |
| a) |
the quality
of the unit member's teaching alone; |
| b) |
teaching and scholarship; |
| c) |
teaching and service to
the University and community; or |
| d) |
teaching, scholarship, and
service to the University and community. |
| |
Tenure track faculty
will be evaluated under category 5.1.d unless their work assignment
specifies otherwise. |
| 5.2 |
Faculty unit employees whose
performance does not include assignments in one or more of the above
areas shall nonetheless be eligible for an FMI on the basis of their
performance in the individual areas of their assignment. Examples would
be part-time faculty assigned only to teaching or full-time faculty
on sabbatical leave for a year. |
| 5.3 |
Teaching is broad and
inclusive. Teaching encompasses instruction and such activities as
advising, mentoring, supervision (e.g., individual studies, thesis
direction, field supervision), and a range of contributions to improving
student learning (e.g., curriculum revision, course and program coordination,
assessment of learning outcomes, and applications of technology).
For faculty unit employees who are coaches,
counselors, or librarians, "professional assignments" shall substitute
for the "teaching" category. |
| 5.4 |
Scholarship includes discovery
(traditionally labeled research, especially published or presented to
professional audiences), integration (e.g., inter- or cross-disciplinary
efforts), application (e.g., used in teaching or solving social, community,
or technical problems), and creative activity (e.g., works of art, performances). |
| 5.5 |
Service to the University
and community is likewise broad. Service to the University and community
includes the activity necessary to the faculty role in shared governance
of the institution (CSU and its campuses) and activity applying the
unit employee's expertise to benefit the University and its community
in general. Examples of service include significant committee work;
student outreach and retention; participation in university and community
organizations, community partnerships, professional associations, faculty
associations, and appropriate governmental boards and commissions; advancement
of public support for the University; and lectures and seminars to community
groups. |
For instructional faculty, service
shall be defined as university service and/or community service, and/or
administrative assignment. Administrative assignment shall be defined as
duties performed as department chair, as program coordinator, or for any
other administrative duties for which assigned time has been provided at
the systemwide, university or college level.
6. Maximum Amounts
and Types of Faculty Merit Increases.
No faculty unit employee shall receive more than a 7.5% FMI in any year.
| 6.1 |
Permanent increase
in base salary. An FMI shall be a permanent increase in the base
salary of the faculty unit employee on the salary schedule in Appendix
C to the MOU, except for faculty unit employees (other than Professors)
who have reached the top of their rank or classification in the salary
schedule in Appendix C. |
| 6.2 |
Bonus (not a permanent
increase in the base salary of the individual). An FMI shall be
a bonus of no more than the equivalent of an annual salary increase
of 7.5% in the case of any faculty unit employee (except for those at
the rank of Professor) who has reached the top of her/his rank or classification
in the salary schedule in Appendix C to the MOU. An FMI may also be
a bonus of no more than an annual salary increase of 7.5% in the case
of any faculty unit member whose demonstrated performance is being recognized
as part of an activity or project conducted by a team, department, or
group of employees. |
7. Levels of Review
and the General Review Process
7.1 There shall be three levels
of review as follows:
| a) |
The Department, |
| b) |
The College Dean, and |
| c) |
The President and/or designee. |
| 7.2 |
A faculty unit member shall
not review his/her own AAR for an FMI. However, no faculty unit employee
shall become ineligible for service on a Department FMI Committee because
he/she is being considered for an FMI. |
| 7.3 |
Each level of review shall
forward all AARs, as well as the recommendations from that level on
each of the faculty unit members, to the next level of review. Failure
to meet any established deadline for recommendations shall automatically
result in the forwarding of all AARs and lower level recommendations
to the next level of review. The timetable for FMI review process is
shown in Attachment 2. |
| 7.4 |
Recommendations for each faculty
unit employee at the first two levels of review in the FMI process shall
include the following: |
| a) |
whether the
faculty unit employee is recommended to receive an FMI, and |
| b) |
if the recommendation in
7.4.a is yes, the amount of the increase recommended. |
8. Allocation of
Funds for FMI Recommendations. The total funds available for FMIs in a
specific cycle shall be subdivided as follows for the purpose of recommendations
at the review levels specified in Section 7.1.
| 8.1 |
An amount equal
to 85% of the FMI pool will be assigned to departments as the amount
they can employ in their recommendations. These funds shall be distributed
to departments on a filled FTEF prorata basis. This amount
in each department shall be termed the Department FMI pool. |
| 8.2 |
An amount equal to 10% of
the FMI pool will be allocated to the president and/or designee. The
expenditure of these funds shall be reported as a distinct category
of the campus report required in the MOU. This amount shall be termed
the President's FMI pool. |
| 8.3 |
The campus shall reserve
an amount equal to 5% of the FMI pool (the FMI appeal pool) to fund
successful appeals. |
| 8.4 |
FMI funds not used in a
particular cycle shall be rolled forward in the aggregate and become
part of the total funds available for FMIs in the next annual FMI
cycle. They are not rolled forward in the specific categories 8.1,
8.2, or 8.3. |
9. Department FMI Recommendation
Structure.
For the purpose of arriving at Departmental
FMI recommendations, departments are free to use a Department FMI Committee,
the department chair, a designee, or any combination of the preceding. The
decision on structure is to be made on an annual basis by a vote of all
faculty unit employees in the department. It is permissible to allow for
procedures that permit votes proportional to time base for part-time unit
members. The department chair shall be responsible for conducting the vote
and for notifying the dean concerning the department decision regarding
the structure by which department FMI decisions will be made. Attachment
3 contains four specific alternatives for making department FMI recommendations
suggested (but not required) by the Faculty Senate. Department procedures
must ensure that no faculty unit member shall participate in the evaluation
of her/his own AAR.
10. FMI Merit Rating and Recommendations
at the Department Level.
Departments shall review the AARs of all qualified
faculty unit employees assigned to the department, including department
chairs. Department reviewers may ask faculty members to clarify the information
in the AAR. For each award period, the Department shall rate the merit of
each faculty unit member using the following scale:
Departments are free to determine how to relate
the amount of an FMI recommendation to the rating scale above. Two possible
approaches are shown in Attachment 4.
Departments may recommend that an individual
faculty unit member receive an FMI at any amount up to the maximum amount
provided in Section 6. The Department's recommendations shall include whether
the faculty unit employee should receive an FMI and also the amount of the
FMI. The total dollars of the department's recommendations for all FMIs recommended
for faculty unit employees in the department shall not exceed the amount of
dollars allocated to the Department in Section 8.1.
Department FMI recommendations and comments shall
be made on the FMI Recommendation Form (Attachment
5) for each faculty unit member and forwarded along with all AARs to the
College Dean. For each faculty unit employee, the department can forward only
one FMI Recommendation Form to the dean and that form can contain only one
set of recommendations regarding FMI ranking, whether to recommend an FMI
and how much.
11. College Dean
Review and Recommendation.
| 11.1 |
All Department
FMI recommendations shall be reviewed by the College Dean. The Dean
may concur or disagree with the recommendations, may change the amount
of any recommended FMI, and/or may recommend an FMI for any member of
the department that was not recommended by the department. The dean
may recommend that an individual receive an FMI of any amount up to
the maximum amount provided in Section 6. It is the Dean's responsibility
to make final recommendations for disposition of all the FMI funds allocated
to departments within the College. Each recommendation shall be made
on the FMI Recommendation Form. |
| 11.2 |
The Dean shall forward the
AAR and all recommendations from the first two levels of review to the
President and/or designee. |
12. President and/or designee
Review and Decision.
The President and/or designee shall review
each AAR and all relevant recommendations from the first two levels of review.
The President and/or designee may concur or disagree with the recommendations,
may change the amount of any recommended FMI, and/or may grant an FMI for
any member of the department that was not recommended by the department
or by the dean. The president may grant that an individual receive an FMI
of any amount up to the maximum amount provided in Section 6. Each decision
shall be made on the FMI Recommendation Form. The total of the recommendations
at this level shall not exceed 95% of the annual FMI funds available, i.e.,
the total of the department FMI pools plus the President's FMI pool.
13. Communication, Rebuttals,
and Appeal During the AAR Review Process.
| 13.1 |
As soon as Department
FMI recommendations are forwarded to the Dean, the Dean shall provide
each faculty unit member with a copy of her/his Department FMI recommendation.
If a faculty unit member disagrees with the recommendation, she/he may
file a written rebuttal with the Dean within seven calendar days of
being sent the recommendation. |
| 13.2 |
The Dean's recommendation
on each faculty unit member shall be forwarded simultaneously to the
faculty unit member and the Office of Academic Personnel. If the faculty
unit member disagrees with the recommendation, she/he may submit a written
rebuttal to the Office of Academic Personnel within seven calendar days
of being sent the recommendation. |
| 13.3 |
The President and/or designee's
decision on each faculty unit member shall be forwarded to the faculty
unit member and the Dean. If the President and/or designee reduces the
FMI recommended by the Dean or the Department, the affected faculty
unit member may submit a written rebuttal to and appeal the decision
of the President and/or designee. The rebuttal and appeal request shall
be submitted in writing to the Office of Academic Personnel within 14
calendar days of being sent the decision. |
| 13.4 |
The appeal shall be heard
by an appeal committee as described in the MOU. The decision of the
appeal committee shall be final and binding. This decision shall be
forwarded simultaneously to the faculty unit member, the President and/or
designee, and the Dean. |
The appeal panel from which the appeal committee
is selected shall be elected at the beginning of Fall quarter by the Faculty
Senate Constituent Unit elections officers. Five members shall be elected
from each Constituent Unit. For this purpose, the five constituent units are
defined as follows: Arts & Letters and Library; Business and Public Administration;
Education; Natural Sciences and Coaches; Social and Behavioral Sciences and
Counselors. All faculty unit employees, tenure track and temporary, shall
be eligible to run and vote. Voting shall be done by the preferential method.
When the appeal committee is selected by lot from the panel, one faculty unit
employee shall be selected from each constituent unit.
14. Use of FMI Materials
in RPT Deliberations.
| 14.1 |
The decision concerning
granting an FMI shall not be considered in deliberations regarding reappointment,
promotion, or tenure (RPT) unless the faculty unit member includes the
material in her/his Personnel Action File (PAF). This shall not preclude
the consideration of any facts during RTP deliberations which are also
considered during FMI deliberations. AARs and notification of all FMI
decisions may be placed in both the PAF and any Working PAF established
for the purpose of RPT evaluations at the discretion of the faculty
unit employee. |
| 14.2 |
The award of FMIs shall not
be considered personnel recommendations, decisions or actions which
must be based upon a faculty unit member's Personnel Action File. However,
this shall not preclude review of a faculty unit member's WPAF during
FMI deliberations. |
15. Campus Information Regarding
Those Receiving FMIs.
A list of faculty unit employees who have received
an FMI, their ranks, the amount of each FMI, and their department affiliations
shall be made public on campus within one month after final decisions regarding
FMIs are made. Awards shall also be reported by amount of increase, gender,
and ethnicity but without individual name.
Completed AARs shall be made available in the
College Office for a period of one year following publication of the awards,
for review by faculty members in that college.
16. Service Salary
Step Increase Procedures (Fiscal Year 1999-2000 and Subsequent Years).
| 16.1 |
Faculty bargaining
unit employees eligible for an SSSI shall be reviewed by the Department
using the same committee/department chair/designee structure the department
has elected to use for the evaluation of department members for FMIs
(Section 9). The Department shall recommend whether to grant or deny
an SSSI; department procedures must ensure that no faculty unit member
shall participate in making the decision regarding her/his own SSSI
award. The department recommendation, using an SSSI Recommendation Form,
shall be forwarded to the College Dean. Department SSSI recommendations
shall be made and forwarded to the Dean before the department FMI recommendations
are made and forwarded. |
| 16.2 |
The recommendation of the
Department shall be reviewed by the College Dean, who shall either grant
or deny the SSSI. An SSSI Recommendation Form (Attachment
6) shall be used. |
| 16.3 |
The criteria to be used when
evaluating faculty bargaining unit employees for an SSSI shall be whether
the employee has demonstrated satisfactory performance commensurate
with rank, work assignment, and years of service. This evaluation shall
be based on the employee's AAR covering the prior year and may include
the employee's Working Personnel Action File. |
| 16.4 |
The decision to deny an SSSI
may be appealed as provided in the MOU, using the FMI Appeals Panel.
The procedure for selecting an SSSI Appeals Committee shall be the same
as for selecting an FMI Appeals Committee. A person who has been selected
to serve on the FMI Appeals Committee may decline to serve on that committee,
if she/he has previously been selected for the SSSI Appeals Committee,
or vice versa. |
FSD 99-02.R1
Approved by the Faculty Senate
Jeanne King, Chair
Reviewed by the Academic Affairs Council
Louis Fernandez, Provost andVice
President for Academic Affairs
Approved by the President
Albert K. Karnig
s99-02.R1
|